rabbitboy33
03-07 08:27 AM
My employer received my labor certification packet last week. However, other than a letter which states that my case has been certified, there was no other certificate/form.
The letter states that "Form 9089 ETA has been certified and is enclosed." However, there are NO other enclosures. Is this how it is usually? OR have they just forgotten to include the certificate/form.
Please help.
The letter states that "Form 9089 ETA has been certified and is enclosed." However, there are NO other enclosures. Is this how it is usually? OR have they just forgotten to include the certificate/form.
Please help.
wallpaper Alex+pettyfer+jace+wayland
wandmaker
05-12 04:04 PM
Thanks for the input. Do you have any publications or IRS findings that you could direct me to that could be used to substantiate the argument that the benefit is non- taxable? I have not been able to find anything that says that the green card is non-taxable.
I am afraid not, you will have to talk to a tax consultant
I am afraid not, you will have to talk to a tax consultant
Blog Feeds
11-14 04:21 AM
Dallas-Fort Worth Immigration Lawyer Has Just Posted the Following:
“If we are truly going to fix a broken system, Congress will have to act”
The following is a statement from Lynn Tramonte, Deputy Director of America’s Voice:
We have entered a new chapter and a new phase in the immigration debate. Secretary Napolitano today laid out the framework for fixing the broken immigration system, and the solution is comprehensive immigration reform. Drawing on her years of experience on the southwest border, and her new role as the nation’s top homeland security official, she said that we need Congress to pass comprehensive immigration reform, and create immigration laws that truly work for our country.
Reform will secure the border, protect all workers, and require undocumented immigrants to register for legal status, pay fines and taxes, clear background checks, and get in line for citizenship. This will benefit all Americans by strengthening the rule of law, bringing in more taxpayers, cutting costs for enforcement, and making our nation’s borders stronger and safer. Now is the time for Congress to take the next step and pass legislation that would accomplish these goals.
As Secretary Napolitano pointed out, the American people support comprehensive immigration reform, and the debate we are about to engage in is not the same old debate. Law enforcement, labor, business, faith, and community leaders are all demanding comprehensive reform for our nation’s security, economy, workers, and families. We have a new President, who was elected because he promised to address important problems like this with practical solutions. We have a new Congress, with leaders who also promised change and progress to the American people.
The Secretary’s speech today was an important moment, but it was just the opening bell. It’s now time for Congress and the Administration to put serious muscle behind advancing the proposal – and it’s time for politicians of all political parties to set aside partisanship and demagoguery, and do what’s right for the country.
More... (http://dfwimmigrationlaw.clarislaw.com/proposed-immigration-laws/secretary-napolitano-makes-the-case-for-comprehensive-immigration-reform.php)
“If we are truly going to fix a broken system, Congress will have to act”
The following is a statement from Lynn Tramonte, Deputy Director of America’s Voice:
We have entered a new chapter and a new phase in the immigration debate. Secretary Napolitano today laid out the framework for fixing the broken immigration system, and the solution is comprehensive immigration reform. Drawing on her years of experience on the southwest border, and her new role as the nation’s top homeland security official, she said that we need Congress to pass comprehensive immigration reform, and create immigration laws that truly work for our country.
Reform will secure the border, protect all workers, and require undocumented immigrants to register for legal status, pay fines and taxes, clear background checks, and get in line for citizenship. This will benefit all Americans by strengthening the rule of law, bringing in more taxpayers, cutting costs for enforcement, and making our nation’s borders stronger and safer. Now is the time for Congress to take the next step and pass legislation that would accomplish these goals.
As Secretary Napolitano pointed out, the American people support comprehensive immigration reform, and the debate we are about to engage in is not the same old debate. Law enforcement, labor, business, faith, and community leaders are all demanding comprehensive reform for our nation’s security, economy, workers, and families. We have a new President, who was elected because he promised to address important problems like this with practical solutions. We have a new Congress, with leaders who also promised change and progress to the American people.
The Secretary’s speech today was an important moment, but it was just the opening bell. It’s now time for Congress and the Administration to put serious muscle behind advancing the proposal – and it’s time for politicians of all political parties to set aside partisanship and demagoguery, and do what’s right for the country.
More... (http://dfwimmigrationlaw.clarislaw.com/proposed-immigration-laws/secretary-napolitano-makes-the-case-for-comprehensive-immigration-reform.php)
2011 Alex Pettyfer: The Mortal
invincibleasian
01-12 07:46 PM
Remember its your responsibility to turn in I94s. No one is going to ask you these when you depart the US. Submitting the i94s and using the us visit system enable correct traclking of your entry/departures. Read the instructions on the 1797 it tells you clearly what you need to do.
more...
eb3_nepa
06-14 02:38 PM
What happens after the I-485?
I guess I-486:D
Funny. :)
But lets be serious about this guys. Maybe we can be proactive about some stuff here. Most of us got caught unawares with retrogression. I am sure we dont want to make the same mistake this time around.
I guess I-486:D
Funny. :)
But lets be serious about this guys. Maybe we can be proactive about some stuff here. Most of us got caught unawares with retrogression. I am sure we dont want to make the same mistake this time around.
sundarpn
07-22 04:20 PM
My attorney has asked for the I-485 to be printed:
double sided with Flip to Top option.
Did anyone else do the same?
double sided with Flip to Top option.
Did anyone else do the same?
more...
factoryman
06-21 05:43 PM
My thinking was : I think it is small (citation and fine); so, you can ignore it.
Thanks for reply
How can I find was it for misdemeanor or battery or felony?
Thanks for reply
How can I find was it for misdemeanor or battery or felony?
2010 Alex Pettyfer as Peeta
srinivas_meena_vinu
07-18 11:15 AM
Hi,
I am a B.COM and AICWA. I have also completed CA-Inter. I have totally 12 years of experience out of which 7 years in IT and 5 years Non-IT. I am currently working as Program Manager. My Labour is approved. My company is trying to get a evaluation done.
Would there be any issues when concurrently filing for I-140 and I-1485 with regard to the Education Evaluation.
I am a B.COM and AICWA. I have also completed CA-Inter. I have totally 12 years of experience out of which 7 years in IT and 5 years Non-IT. I am currently working as Program Manager. My Labour is approved. My company is trying to get a evaluation done.
Would there be any issues when concurrently filing for I-140 and I-1485 with regard to the Education Evaluation.
more...
Charleh
01-20 11:01 AM
I've fixed and done a bit more on the project since then - I'll see if I can get a test project to you so you can have a look.
hair Hutcherson beat Alex Pettyfer
rpatel
12-12 09:51 AM
I have an opportunity to do some consulting work for a company B on a part-time basis apart from my current full time job with company A. I know that I will need another H1 for the part time gig but what I am confused about is whether the company B has to wait for next years quota to file for an H1 or can it file immediately ? Meaning is the H1b quota tied to max no of individuals ? or to max no of positions ?
I would appreciate if some one knowledgeable about the issue can comment on my question:confused:
I would appreciate if some one knowledgeable about the issue can comment on my question:confused:
more...
GoldenBoy
10-13 07:09 AM
so its possible to edit swfs from swift in to flash mx or something
if so thats how?what id like to now
thanks:)
if so thats how?what id like to now
thanks:)
hot Peeta Mellark.
nomad
09-13 01:44 AM
Great work Chandu and team!
Thanks to Puneet and Tanya for providing fodder for this final video presentation
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B-MtK_rQ1zk
B-MtK_rQ1zk
Thanks to Puneet and Tanya for providing fodder for this final video presentation
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B-MtK_rQ1zk
B-MtK_rQ1zk
more...
house and Alex Pettyfer would be
askreddy
07-26 12:49 AM
Hi
Which part of address change trigger RFE
1) Submitting AR11
OR
2) Changing address for pending 485.
Will any one at USCIS does anything/do processing/look into it, if you just submit AR11.
Thanks
Which part of address change trigger RFE
1) Submitting AR11
OR
2) Changing address for pending 485.
Will any one at USCIS does anything/do processing/look into it, if you just submit AR11.
Thanks
tattoo If Pettyfer is cast as Peeta,
India_USA
04-28 12:59 PM
i 94 is for each person, so yes, your dad and mom have to have i 94 separately
more...
pictures Peeta Mellark: Alex Pettyfer
deardar
06-18 04:09 PM
I dont directly work with attorney, the company works so by the time the information gets relayed its taking time.
dresses Alex Pettyfer- He was a strong
bigboy007
11-01 11:40 AM
Hello i am running in to issues of how to get address changed. To give you guys previews. We were residing in Chicago till July ending. In August we moved to CT as my wife got a new job there. But since my work location is in IL , I requested my employer whether its possible to work remotely and its ok by law. He said u can change ur residential address and there is no need to amend LCa/H1b as there is no change in work location in my case. Fine for now.
I recently visited CT DMV and requested for CT state license. They denied to me saying that i need a CT employer letter or My employer should issue letter to DMV stating my work location changed. Neither of these are going to happen. For now i have my license and Plate from IL itself. I can still continue to maintain but renewing Plates and Pollution test are pain being in CT any ideas please ?
I recently visited CT DMV and requested for CT state license. They denied to me saying that i need a CT employer letter or My employer should issue letter to DMV stating my work location changed. Neither of these are going to happen. For now i have my license and Plate from IL itself. I can still continue to maintain but renewing Plates and Pollution test are pain being in CT any ideas please ?
more...
makeup like Alex Pettyfer,
wait4ever
11-12 12:01 PM
Hi California members,
There is an IV action item to fight recent practice of USCIS in denying I485 applications in some AC21 cases. For more info, please visit:
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=22182
It�s a serious issue which can affect many of us, please act now and send letters (letter formats and everything else is ready in the thread quoted above). It will only take a few minutes of your time.
State chapter leader,
Please try to bring attention of your state members to this IV core approved effort.
Thank you.
CAn you tell me the logic of posting multiple threads with this subject - wont just bumping the thread give you the same effect - this is really irritating
There is an IV action item to fight recent practice of USCIS in denying I485 applications in some AC21 cases. For more info, please visit:
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=22182
It�s a serious issue which can affect many of us, please act now and send letters (letter formats and everything else is ready in the thread quoted above). It will only take a few minutes of your time.
State chapter leader,
Please try to bring attention of your state members to this IV core approved effort.
Thank you.
CAn you tell me the logic of posting multiple threads with this subject - wont just bumping the thread give you the same effect - this is really irritating
girlfriend Gale, Peeta, and other
Phogs
07-07 10:52 PM
If finance is not an issue with u or co. then renew it as a fall back. U'll never know that those guys in USCIS will do on your papers. So it is better to be safer than safe =)
PD 2004 ROW:(
I140/485 Pending:confused:
EAD/AP Approved:p
filed H1B Extention 4/18/2008:D comapny paid for it.
PD 2004 ROW:(
I140/485 Pending:confused:
EAD/AP Approved:p
filed H1B Extention 4/18/2008:D comapny paid for it.
hairstyles alex pettyfer long hair.
ruby
09-24 12:29 PM
Can someone please point to official details of interfiling? My lawyer is not using it to make use of my better PD.
Paisano
05-01 08:58 PM
1) As per the law, you and your husband both are supposed to leave the country the next day. But USCIS generally allows upto 30 days to leave. As per the law, he can not stay for a couple of weeks to look for another job. Both of you are supposed to leave the country.
2) Yes. You both will be out of status but you will not be accuring unlawful presence if your I-94 is valid. You will start accuring unlawful presence once the employer withdraws H1B petition. The unlawful presence is the one which will make your bar from the country for 3 years (after 180 days and under 1 year) or 10 years (more than a year).
3) No. It may not be a issue with GC processing. Under 245 rules, unlawful presence upto 180 days is allowed.
4) You have to submit your I-539 petition along with your husband's H1B petition. Your status is tied to your husband's status.
2) Yes. You both will be out of status but you will not be accuring unlawful presence if your I-94 is valid. You will start accuring unlawful presence once the employer withdraws H1B petition. The unlawful presence is the one which will make your bar from the country for 3 years (after 180 days and under 1 year) or 10 years (more than a year).
3) No. It may not be a issue with GC processing. Under 245 rules, unlawful presence upto 180 days is allowed.
4) You have to submit your I-539 petition along with your husband's H1B petition. Your status is tied to your husband's status.
ameryki
04-08 04:14 PM
yep EAD is linked to your 485 application and not your employer. especially after 180 days of 485 filing a lot people consider themselves free to jump the boat with very little to no issues.
No comments:
Post a Comment